Sunday, February 25, 2007


Carl F. Worden

Most of the presidential candidates of both parties are now claiming that their vote for, or support of, the war in Iraq, was a “mistake”. That’s just not true.

The vote to give President Bush the “authority” to invade Iraq was illegal on its face. It was a blatant violation of the same Constitution every elected congressperson swore to uphold and defend upon taking office. There may be several areas of the Constitution and Bill of Rights that seem ambiguous, but the exclusive authority of Congress to declare war is not one of them.

Nothing in the Constitution gives Congress the right to transfer their power to declare war to the Executive Branch, and Article X of the Bill of Rights slams the door on any argument to the contrary.

To paraphrase Article X, if the power to do something is not expressly given the federal government by the Constitution, then that power is reserved to the individual states and/or the people. Since nothing in the Constitution gives Congress the right to transfer their power to declare war to any other government body, Article X says they can’t, and that’s that.

If war is to be waged, it must be plainly voted for by the Congress.

Where the proposed invasion of Iraq was concerned, the reason Congress chose an illegal resolution to give their authority to declare war to the president was not a mistake: Every member who voted for that illegal resolution did it in order to avoid direct responsibility in case the war went badly – as it certainly has. It was a calculated and deliberate act, motivated entirely for political reasons, and it certainly was not a “mistake”.

Now, these same candidates want you to vote for them because they now admit their “mistake”. Hillary Clinton wants you to accept her apology, and so does Joe Biden and John McCain and on and on. One of the few candidates who voted against illegally giving President Bush the authority to invade Iraq is Representative Ron Paul of Texas.

Representative Paul, often referred to in Congress as “Dr. No”, voted against the Iraq Resolution because it was plainly unconstitutional. Representative Paul has a strict litmus test he runs before he votes for any bill coming before Congress, and that test is to determine whether or not the proposed bill is constitutional. Obviously, Rep. Ron Paul saw that it was not.

What a renegade Representative Paul is! No wonder hardly any members of Congress like him! No wonder CNN and FOX and the vast majority of the mass media are ignoring the fact Representative Paul is a probable presidential candidate. The man is a congressional dinosaur – a Paleo-Conservative who actually demands strict constitutional adherence by the federal government.

Oh my…

Can you imagine the horrors Ron Paul would bring to the Office of the Presidency of the United States? The man might actually fulfill his constitutional duty as president by immediately ordering the borders of the United States to be secured. He might never commit the men and women of the United States armed forces to another “police action” like Korea or Vietnam or Iraq. Gosh, it would be a nightmare for Congress to have a strict constitutionist running the Executive Branch! The man would veto just about every bill that came before him.

Had Ron Paul been president in 2003, over 3,000 young men and women in our military would still be alive today. Many more young Americans would still have full use of their arms and legs – and even still have them attached. Tens of thousands of Iraqi citizens would still be alive today, albeit under the strict and often brutal thumb of Saddam Hussein, but don’t even try to use that tired old argument on them. If the average Iraqi had his druthers, Saddam’s rule, brutal or not, would still be intact and preferred – and all the Iraqi polls all show that.

If Representative Ron Paul clearly saw a violation of constitutional law by voting for a resolution to let President Bush decide whether or not to invade Iraq, why didn’t the vast majority of his congressional body? Answer: They did. They knew exactly what they were doing. Those congresspersons all knew it was unconstitutional, and they voted for the resolution anyway.

Please have no illusions: The media will force us to look at only those candidates the media and the corporate powers that be want us to seriously consider. In the Republican corner we have “front-runners” Rudy Guiliani and John McCain, and in the Democratic corner we have Obama, Hillary and John Edwards. As usual, they are trying to force-feed us those individuals to the exclusion of all others – and their tactics will probably work just as well as they have all the past elections because the average voter in America is stupid and doesn’t know the Constitution from Jack anyway.

But when you hear all these front-runner presidential candidates claim they made a mistake voting to give the president the power to declare war on Iraq, try to remember it wasn’t a mistake at all. If they proved their willingness to violate the plain language of the Constitution in that matter, they will do so again, and it won’t be a mistake then, either.

Not one of them is fit to be President.

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

A Study in North American Union

Just when you thought you had a grip on the NAU (North American Union) and its scope, more disturbing news arrives indicating that this horrendous project isn't half-baked, but ready to be forked.
by Kelly Taylor
The New American

Monday, February 19, 2007

Here We Go Again

The Constitution Party Warns Americans: War against Iran will be as unconstitutional as war against Iraq and Afghanistan.

LANCASTER, PA: Echoing the alarm that millions of Americans now feel regarding what appears to be imminent war against Iran, the nation’s third largest political party, the Constitution Party strongly urges pre-emptive action by Congress NOW to avert another unauthorized, ill-conceived military strike in the Middle East.

The voice of reason can be summed up in N.C. Congressman Walter Jones’ resolution (HJR 14) which states that:

“Absent a national emergency created by attack by Iran, or a demonstrably imminent attack by Iran, upon the United States, its territories or possessions or its armed forces, the President shall consult with Congress, and receive specific authorization pursuant to law from Congress, prior to initiating any use of military force against Iran.”

“You would think at this point Americans would understand that a congressional resolution such as HJR 14 should be completely unnecessary, because according to the Constitution, only CONGRESS can declare war. We shouldn’t have to make provisions for the President to follow the Constitution when it is clear - going to war is something that was never, ever to be decided by presidents,” said Constitution Party National Chairman Jim Clymer.

According to polls, close to 70% of Americans do not approve of the way the president has handled the war in Iraq ( Regardless, President Bush has now primed the war pump for yet another unauthorized military occupation - this time in Iran.

“Americans who voted for a party change in Congress hoping to see an end to the Iraq war must now admit the choices in American politics are mostly smoke and mirrors. Instead of a quick end to U.S. involvement in Iraq, it appears the addition of 21,000 more soldiers means we will be there for quite some time,” Clymer added.

Déjà Vu

“Looking back exactly 4 years ago to the specious rationale that was used for beginning the Iraq invasion, it’s utterly astounding that we are being fed more of the same pap as justification for another unconstitutional war with another middle eastern country”, Clymer said.

It’s Time

We must consider the past, the present and look to the future. The Constitution Party, the third largest party in terms of voter registrations, opposes all unconstitutional military incursions, espouses a return to limited government and challenges Americans to declare the time has come to seek real political change with America’s only pro-life, pro-gun, pro limited government party, the Constitution Party.

Saturday, February 17, 2007

What the Fed Is Doing to the Economy

Ron Paul on Bernanke's mischief.

Wednesday, February 14, 2007

Record Trade Gap Presages Future Poverty and the Annihilation of the Middle Class

Boulder, CO - A fifth consecutive record annual trade deficit was announced this week, with the trade gap reaching an incredible $763 billion for 2006. The ballooning trade deficit highlights the dangerous flight of money capital and industrial capability overseas, a real hemorrhaging of the economic life of the nation. These dire statistics mean that we are purchasing more and more from overseas, and manufacturing less and less domestically. The resulting downward pressure on the dollar jeopardizes our nation's purchasing power.

The resulting hollowing-out of domestic industries and loss of jobs prefigures a future of poverty for the present middle class, while future money managers and wealthy rentiers will be able to live off interest from servicing public and private debt, now at about 300% of the GDP. As jobs flee, people are turning to credit. Total debt now exceeds its peak during the great depression. But as in past declining empires, financial services are booming, generating more revenues than the manufacturing sector.

National Chairman Jonathan Hill stated, "The trade gap and its negative consequences result from failure to protect the strategic and domestic national interest with tariffs. The result is that we are jeopardizing our independence as a nation, both economically and politically."

National Secretary John Hey stated, "The crux of the problem is that Congress has delegated to the WTO and NAFTA trade regime one of its crucial and exclusive constitutional powers -- the regulation of trade. Our trade policy with over 140 nations is controlled by the WTO, where the U.S. has only one of 140+ votes in matters critical to the livelihood of 300 million Americans. Congressmen who support this policy are in blatant violation of the obligations of their oath of
office, probably deliberately so."

The America First Party calls for an end to U.S. participation in NAFTA and the WTO, and for revenue tariffs on all foreign-made goods sold in the United States to achieve balanced trade and to replace the income tax. This will not only protect our industries, but help reduce the precarious debt burden of the American people.

America First Party
1630 A 30th Street #111
Boulder, Colorado 80301

The Shearing is Nearing

by Dr. Edwin Vieira, Ph.D.,JD

Tuesday, February 13, 2007

Ron Paul for President in 2008

Member of the U.S. House of Representatives
from Texas's 14th district
In office 1976-1977; 1979-1985; 1997-present


Vote for Congressman RON PAUL for President in 2008 !!!
Let's have someone who supports the people & the US Constitution for a change!

To donate to his campaign

Read some of the articles he's written & his stand on issues

Ronald Ernest "Ron" Paul (born 20 August 1935) is an American physician and politician from the U.S. state of Texas. A Republican, he has represented Texas's 14th congressional district in the U.S. House of Representatives since 1997, and had previously served as the representative from Texas's 22nd district in 1976 and from 1979 to 1985.

In 1984, Paul ran in the Republican primary for the U.S. Senate seat vacated by John Tower, but the nomination went to Phil Gramm. Paul also supported term limits for members of Congress at the time and likened himself to the famous Senator Robert A. Taft. Paul was the Libertarian Party nominee for president in the 1988 election. After his failed presidential bid, Paul returned to Congress in 1997. He was again elected as a Republican, but against the wishes of the party leadership, which had backed Paul's primary opponent. His opponent in the primary was the incumbent representative, a former Democrat who had switched his party affiliation to Republican in the aftermath of the 1994 Republican Revolution. On 11 January 2007, Paul announced the formation of an exploratory committee for a 2008 presidential campaign.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unlike many political candidates, Paul receives the overwhelming majority of his campaign contributions (92.5% in 2004 and 96.8% in 2006) from individuals.


Paul professes a limited government, libertarian ideology. His regular votes against almost all proposals for government spending, initiatives, or taxes, and his frequent dissents in otherwise unanimous votes have irritated some of his Republican colleagues and have earned him the nickname "Dr. No" (an example being his dissenting vote in the No Child Left Behind Act where he was one of three Representatives voting against it).

Foreign policy

Congressman Paul advocates a strict non-interventionist foreign policy. He voted against the Iraq War Resolution and continues to criticize the US presence in Iraq, and what he charges is the use of the war on terror to curtail civil liberties. He has also broken with his party by voting against the Patriot Act in 2001 and again in 2005, and is very opposed to a military draft. He endorses American withdrawal from the United Nations.

In a recent speech before the House of Representatives, Paul expressed his concern about the possibility of an Iran War. He claimed that the current circumstances with Iran are similar to those under which the Iraq War began, and urged Congress not to authorize a war with Iran.

Ron Paul has taken some positions on foreign policy issues that some libertarians do not agree with. He voted against the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA), claiming that it increased the size of government, and has supported border security and opposed illegal immigration.

Economic views

Paul's economic views oppose nearly all government intervention in the market. He supports the abolition of the income tax, most Cabinet departments and the Federal Reserve. His opposition to the Federal Reserve is based on his belief that instead of containing inflation, the Federal Reserve, in theory and in practice, is responsible for causing inflation. Paul believes that in addition to eroding the value of individual savings, this creation of inflation leads to booms and busts in the economy. This economic theory is known as Austrian Business Cycle Theory (ABCT). Thus Paul would say that government, via a central bank (the Federal Reserve), is the primary cause of economic recessions and depressions. He has stated in numerous speeches that most of his colleagues in Congress are unwilling to abolish the central bank because it funds many government activities. He says that to compensate for eliminating the "hidden tax" of inflation, Congress and the president would instead have to raise taxes or cut government services, either of which could be politically damaging to their reputations. He also endorses defederalization of the healthcare system. Paul's campaign slogan for 2004 was "The Taxpayers' Best Friend!".

John Berthoud, president of the National Taxpayers Union, an organization that promotes lower tax rates, has said, "Ron Paul has always proven himself to be a leader in the fight for taxpayer rights and fiscal responsibility... No one can match his record on behalf of taxpayers." He is frequently considered an advocate of small business. Jack Farris, president of the National Federation of Independent Business, has said, "Congressman Ron Paul is a true friend of small business....He is committed to a pro-small-business agenda of affordable health insurance, lower taxes, tort reform, and the elimination of burdensome mandates."

Support for the gold standard

In many public speeches Paul has called for the re-introduction of the gold standard, the effect of which would result in the United States Government making large purchases of gold and issuing currency only to the extent of its ownership of gold. Ron Paul supports the gold standard to prevent inflation.

He has also called for the removal of all taxes on gold transactions. In 2002 he proposed legislation abolishing the Federal Reserve Board, enabling "America to return to the type of monetary system envisioned by our Nation's founders: one where the value of money is consistent because it is tied to a commodity such as gold."[15] Paul's personal financial disclosures reveal extensive private investments in gold and silver, through equities and warrants in companies including Newmont, IAM Gold, Barrick Gold, Golden Star Resources, Golden Cycle Gold Corp, Pan American Silver, Great Basin Gold, Eldorado Gold, Freeport McMoran Gold & Copper, Apollo Gold Corp and Placer Dome.

He is also a supporter of the notion that Dollar hegemony has led to war and may do so again. He says that if a petroleum producing state starts trading in Petroeuro instead of Petrodollar the world's dollar reserves will shrink and hurt the US economy. The US might seek to prevent such an action by going to war, a scenario that Paul opposes and says could be prevented by a return to backing the USD with gold.

Medical marijuana

Dr. Paul was Co-Sponsor of H.R. 2592, the States' Rights to Medical Marijuana and is affirmative to the question "Should marijuana be a medical option?"

Industrial hemp

In 2005 he introduced H.R. 3037, the Industrial Hemp Farming Act of 2005, "to amend the Controlled Substances Act to exclude industrial hemp from the definition of marijuana, and for other purposes". This bill would have given the states the power to regulate farming of hemp. The measure would be a first since the national prohibition of industrial hemp farming in the United States.

He believes that the Constitution does not give Congress the authority to ban or regulate drugs in general.

Election law reform

As a former Libertarian Party candidate for President, Congressman Paul has been a proponent of ballot access law reform, and spoken out on numerous election law reform issues.

In 2004, he spoke out against efforts to abolish the Electoral College, stating that such a reform would weaken the "voting power of pro-liberty states".

In 2003, he introduced H.R. 1941, the Voter Freedom Act of 2003, that would have created fairer and uniform ballot access laws for independent and third political party candidates in Congressional elections . He supported this bill in a speech before Congress in 2004.

In 2003, he spoke out against the enacted law that appoints members of Congress in the event of the death of several members due to an act of terrorism.

In 2002, he spoke before the Congress in opposition to campaign finance reforms that place any restrictions on citizens and businesses making campaign contributions to the candidate of their choice on First Amendment grounds.


Paul is pro-life. However, Paul believes that the United States Constitution does not grant the federal government any authority to legalize or ban abortion. He believes that abortion is "not a constitutional issue" and should be a decision left to the legislatures of the states. He has also introduced H.R. 1658 and H.R. 4379 that would prohibit the Supreme Court from ruling on issues relating to abortion, birth control, the definition of marriage and homosexuality and states that the court's precedent in these areas would no longer be binding.

He once said, "The best solution, of course, is not now available to us. That would be a Supreme Court that recognizes that for all criminal laws, the several states retain jurisdiction."

Congressman Paul adheres to the consistent life ethic, and therefore opposes all forms of killing not done in self-defense. His pro-life views factor into his support for non-interventionism, and are the reason he opposes capital punishment. Paul introduced The Sanctity of Life Act of 2005, which would remove jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in cases involving abortion laws in individual States. This would effectively freeze the current law established by Roe v. Wade, and would allow states to pass laws contrary to Roe v. Wade with little fear of them being overturned through the Federal court system.

Same-sex marriage and adoption

Congressman Paul's position on gay marriage is that defining and recognizing marriages is not a federal or constitutional matter, but should be left as the States' right. In 1999 he voted for H.R. 2587 that banned gay couples adopting children in the District of Columbia.

He voted against the Federal Marriage Amendment in 2004. In a 2004 speech before Congress he expressed support for the Federal Defense of Marriage Act and expressed his support for the Marriage Protection Act as an alternative to the FMA.

Internet and technology

In 2006, a "Technology voter guide" by CNET awarded Paul a score of 80%, the highest score out of both houses of Congress. Paul has been criticized for voting against legislation to help catch online child predators, one of the votes used in the CNET guide. In response to critics, Paul said, "I have a personal belief that the responsibility of raising kids, educating kids and training kids is up to the parents and not the state. Once the state gets involved, it becomes too arbitrary." He also believed that the proposed law was unconstitutional.

Minor issues

Paul's supporters say he is willing to take unpopular positions in order to defend what he regards as constitutional limited government.

He has been criticized at times for his voting record, being the only dissenting vote against giving Pope John Paul II, Rosa Parks and Mother Teresa the Congressional Gold Medal of Honor. According to Texas Monthly, "When he was criticized for voting against the medal [for Parks], he chided his colleagues by challenging them to personally contribute $100 to mint the medal. No one did, of course. At the time, Paul observed, 'It's easier to be generous with other people's money.'"

In a speech on 25 June 2003, criticizing giving Tony Blair a Gold Medal of Honor, Paul said, "These medals generally have been proposed to recognize a life of service and leadership, and not for political reasons - as evidenced by the overwhelming bipartisan support for awarding President Reagan, a Republican, a gold medal. These awards normally go to deserving individuals, which is why I have many times offered to contribute $100 of my own money, to be matched by other members, to finance these medals." Texas Monthly awarded him the "Bum Steer" award for voting against a congressional honor for cartoonist Charles Schulz.

He views the new American Community Survey questions as "both ludicrous and insulting", viewing that the information is simply none of the government's business.

On January 22, 2007, Paul was the lone member out of 415 voting to oppose a House measure to create a National Archives exhibit on slavery and Reconstruction.

2008 Presidential Campaign

On 11 January 2007, Paul filed papers to form an exploratory committee for the 2008 presidential race. This will increase his fund raising opportunities until his presumed eventual announcement.

The Associated Press reports:

Kent Snyder, the chairman of Paul's exploratory committee and a former staffer on Paul's Libertarian campaign, said the congressman knows he's a long shot.
Snyder said Paul is running to win, not just to make a point or to try to ensure that his issues are addressed. Paul is expected to formally announce his bid in the next week or two, Snyder said. Snyder said Paul and his supporters are not intimidated by the presence of nationally known and better-financed candidates, such as Sen. John McCain of Arizona or former Gov. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts.
"This is going to be a grassroots American campaign," he said. "For us, it's either going to happen at the grassroots level or it's not."

On 22 January 2007, Reason Magazine's Brian Doherty interviewed Paul about his presidential bid. When asked about what issues he would emphasize, Paul responded:

Everything I've talked about for 20 years! I think the biggest thing for Republican primary voters is that most Republicans are turned off right now. They've had a beating and are reassessing their values. They have to decide what they believe in. The Republican Party has become about big government conservatism, and Republicans need to hear the message they used to hear: that conservatives are supposed to be for small government. Paul also indicated that his grassroots campaign will attempt to take full advantage of the Internet. reported in January 2007 that many libertarians and conservatives may be turning towards Paul because they are frustrated by their early option in the 2008 front-runners.

Books by Ron Paul
Challenge to Liberty
The Case for Gold. ISBN 0-932790-31-3.
A Republic, If You Can Keep It
Mises and Austrian Economics: A Personal View. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 1984.

District and contact information
Texas's 14th congressional district stretches from the Gulf Coast in Galveston and Chambers counties almost to Corpus Christi; north through Victoria; and east through Jackson and Wharton counties toward Houston. It includes western parts of Fort Bend county, then slopes south through Brazoria county.

Washington: 203 Cannon House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515.
Phone Number: (202) 225-2831
Lake Jackson, Texas: 122 West Way, Suite 301, Lake Jackson, TX 77566.
Phone Number: (979) 285-0231
Victoria, Texas: 312 S Main Street, Suite 229, Victoria, TX 77901.
Phone Number: (361) 576-1231
Galveston, Texas: 601 25th Street, Suite 216, Galveston, TX 77550.
Phone Number: (409) 766-7013
In addition, Ron Paul's office runs a toll-free telephone line with a recorded message updated weekly at (888) 322-1414.


America: Freedom To Fascism (free video)
The Federal Reserve (privately owned) & the illegal Income Tax -
how they are destroying America.

Monday, February 12, 2007

Democracy Versus Liberty (pdf)

by James Bovard
Foundation for Economic Education

Monday, February 05, 2007

WARNING: The End of America as we Know It is at Hand

The Bush Administration has been pursuing a blending of Canada, America and Mexico into the “North American Union.” They have done it under the cover of governmental darkness. They have been running a race as to how fast they can manipulate our great nation into a “no going back” strategic position with these other two nations. The president and his cabal of sell-out White House/Congressional turncoats have intentionally kept the American people in a state of confusion (war on terror, etc.) so that organized resistance to this national sovereignty killing plan can not be formulated...
by Greg Evensen

Saturday, February 03, 2007

The Price of Empire

It's our freedom, says Charley Reese.

Friday, February 02, 2007

President Misstates Role of Elected Officials

by Howard J. Blitz
Yuma Sun

The Challenge of Distilling Ayn Rand's "Atlas Shrugged"

by Kimberly Brown
International Herald Tribune