SEMANTICS SAYS THE MEDIA KNOWS RON PAUL WILL WIN IOWA
By Carl F. Worden
I am a student of semantics, which is the study of the choice of words people use in a given situation, and everything I am hearing and reading indicates the media and both major political parties know Ron Paul will win the Iowa Caucus on Tuesday.
They've tried every dirty trick so far and nothing has had the desired effect. From deliberately ignoring Ron Paul in the debates to outright lies about Ron Paul being a racist and just about every other possible false accusation, Ron Paul is continuing to survive and grow in popularity.
Here's an example: Thomas F. Schaller teaches political science at the University of Maryland and he wrote a completely biased opinion piece about Ron Paul's alleged racism, his alleged homophobia and his insensitivity in general for the McClatchey News Service. The telling use of semantics occurs in the ninth paragraph where Schaller happens to mention, "None of Paul's radical beliefs would really matter if the Texas congressman were slogging around in fifth or sixth place in the Republican primary. But he isn't. His poll numbers are rising. He might win the Iowa Caucuses this week".
What have I been telling you? The media, the Republican Party and the Dems are all panicked by the possibility of a Paul nomination, yet what exactly are they opposing? Ron Paul asserts a return to pure constitutional rule. That's a radical belief?? Ron Paul asserts exactly what our Founders and Framers did upon signing the Constitution into law, and that is to avoid foreign entanglements. No matter what anyone tries to tell you to the contrary, the attacks of 9/11/2001 happened in retaliation for our many years of meddling in Middle Eastern affairs, mainly because we don't want to have our oil supply cut off, so we think we have the right to interfere with the internal social and political machinations of the nations we're importing oil from. Ron Paul has been accused of being anti-Semitic regarding Israel, but that's just another fat lie. All Ron Paul has said about Israel is that we should back off and not tell Israel what to do, and that is probably music to the ears of the Israelis too.
When somebody spouts off about Ron Paul, it reminds me of the people who insist the Bible is full of bologna. I always ask those idiots which one of the Ten Commandments they personally disagree with, and I never get a specific answer. Same thing where Ron Paul is concerned. I always ask what policy or position Ron Paul has actually taken that they might vehemently disagree with, and they usually state they disagree with something Ron Paul never said or supported at all! Their level of ignorance is appalling indeed.
Just yesterday, I heard some CNN talking head claim that out of the entire Republican Party, only 6% of the hard core support Ron Paul. That is so factually preposterous it is almost amusing. You might state that as fact when addressing the candidacy of Rick Santorum, but Ron Paul enjoys solid support in the Republican Party, specifically among Tea Party voters which account for a lot more than 6% of Republicans.
People like Thomas Schaller just lie and lie and lie, and that is exactly why hardly anyone is paying attention to what they have to say or write like we once did.
This election really is different. Anyone like a Romney, who has raised millions of dollars to get elected, is viewed this time with extreme suspicion because, as anyone should know by now, only the huge multinational corporations have that kind of election money to pass out, and the very last group we want to empower in this nation is the corporations. Ron Paul is an original construction constitutionist and people like Schaller consider that a threat? If so, Schaller is a traitor to this nation and should be dealt with as all traitors are traditionally dealt with: Execution, or more preferably, he should be stripped of his citizenship and left to find a nation he approves of -- so long as it is not here.
If you don't like our Constitution, Schaller, get the hell out!
I am a student of semantics, which is the study of the choice of words people use in a given situation, and everything I am hearing and reading indicates the media and both major political parties know Ron Paul will win the Iowa Caucus on Tuesday.
They've tried every dirty trick so far and nothing has had the desired effect. From deliberately ignoring Ron Paul in the debates to outright lies about Ron Paul being a racist and just about every other possible false accusation, Ron Paul is continuing to survive and grow in popularity.
Here's an example: Thomas F. Schaller teaches political science at the University of Maryland and he wrote a completely biased opinion piece about Ron Paul's alleged racism, his alleged homophobia and his insensitivity in general for the McClatchey News Service. The telling use of semantics occurs in the ninth paragraph where Schaller happens to mention, "None of Paul's radical beliefs would really matter if the Texas congressman were slogging around in fifth or sixth place in the Republican primary. But he isn't. His poll numbers are rising. He might win the Iowa Caucuses this week".
What have I been telling you? The media, the Republican Party and the Dems are all panicked by the possibility of a Paul nomination, yet what exactly are they opposing? Ron Paul asserts a return to pure constitutional rule. That's a radical belief?? Ron Paul asserts exactly what our Founders and Framers did upon signing the Constitution into law, and that is to avoid foreign entanglements. No matter what anyone tries to tell you to the contrary, the attacks of 9/11/2001 happened in retaliation for our many years of meddling in Middle Eastern affairs, mainly because we don't want to have our oil supply cut off, so we think we have the right to interfere with the internal social and political machinations of the nations we're importing oil from. Ron Paul has been accused of being anti-Semitic regarding Israel, but that's just another fat lie. All Ron Paul has said about Israel is that we should back off and not tell Israel what to do, and that is probably music to the ears of the Israelis too.
When somebody spouts off about Ron Paul, it reminds me of the people who insist the Bible is full of bologna. I always ask those idiots which one of the Ten Commandments they personally disagree with, and I never get a specific answer. Same thing where Ron Paul is concerned. I always ask what policy or position Ron Paul has actually taken that they might vehemently disagree with, and they usually state they disagree with something Ron Paul never said or supported at all! Their level of ignorance is appalling indeed.
Just yesterday, I heard some CNN talking head claim that out of the entire Republican Party, only 6% of the hard core support Ron Paul. That is so factually preposterous it is almost amusing. You might state that as fact when addressing the candidacy of Rick Santorum, but Ron Paul enjoys solid support in the Republican Party, specifically among Tea Party voters which account for a lot more than 6% of Republicans.
People like Thomas Schaller just lie and lie and lie, and that is exactly why hardly anyone is paying attention to what they have to say or write like we once did.
This election really is different. Anyone like a Romney, who has raised millions of dollars to get elected, is viewed this time with extreme suspicion because, as anyone should know by now, only the huge multinational corporations have that kind of election money to pass out, and the very last group we want to empower in this nation is the corporations. Ron Paul is an original construction constitutionist and people like Schaller consider that a threat? If so, Schaller is a traitor to this nation and should be dealt with as all traitors are traditionally dealt with: Execution, or more preferably, he should be stripped of his citizenship and left to find a nation he approves of -- so long as it is not here.
If you don't like our Constitution, Schaller, get the hell out!
posted by Chuck Demastus at 5:01 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home