Climate Comedies
Dr. A. H. Krieg
kriega@frii.com
In life as well as science a certain amount of “reading between the lines” becomes imperative for if we saw every issue by just its face value we should shortly find ourselves in intricacy.
The continuing and ever expanding revelations from the “Green Movement” and the IPCC of the UN and numerous centers of academia seem sufficient to keep all the world entertained. And if that doesn’t suffice R. K Pachauri Chairman of IPCC is always good for a few laughs. I have written and commented on the world climate situation for over four decades, I disagreed with the assertion that we were headed for a new ice age twenty years ago, and since have opposed the greens on global warming, now altered to climate change. These fools are relentless, like a troop of chameleons they adjust their position on a constant and regular basis. What many do not understand is that the entire green movement was co-opted by the socialist movement [the progressives] in the late 60’s. Socialism due to its inherent failure as an economic model converted their efforts to environmentalism in the mid 60’s and they have operated from that position on the scientific front ever since. On the political face they changed their name and beginning during the Wilson administration commenced calling themselves “Progressives” Like Obama, also a progressive, these people are ideologues that refuse to accept the reality of socialisms failure, as is demonstrated in the twenty or so nations that tried it and failed. Sir Winston Churchill said it best; “Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy. Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.” Peloci, Reid and Obama intend to drive this failed system down your throats whether you like it or not. The very fact that academic and political failures like Al Gore and a failed politician Michael Gorbachev are the main drummers on this issue should make us all queasy.
The latest shoe to drop was the realization that the 2007 IPCC report on climate change that was touted as the consensus position of over 2,500 scientists was not peer reviewed, was faulty, contained misinformation, was not properly vetted and contained one Swiss graduate students term paper and a mountain climbing magazine article as proof of global warming. From released E-mail traffic of CRU (Climate Research Unit) at East Anglia University in the UK we have been apprised that researchers have been diddling information and research numbers for over ten years the latest in November 2009. The University is very upset that hackers broke into their computer systems and spilled the proverbial beans on an international scam. The University wants immediate police action taken against the Hackers, seems to us they should be ferreting out the scientist criminals responsible for the worldwide distribution of bogus information that will in the long term cost all of us millions.
This begs the question of how is all this possible? Research scientists all vie for limited grants from government, business and foundations. Much of these funds are provided based on outcome goals. In other words, lets per example take a large corporation that just happens to be a manufacturer of wind turbines, you know bird swatters. Naturally as the manufacturer of such a product in which he will have invested millions is eager to peruse sources that will enhance their ablity to sell these bird swatters. As such he progresses with two policies. Firstly financing global warming/CO2 issues by funding research that supports that position. This is called outcome-based research and it is totally useless. It is not research at all it is the process of trying to support false information through pre-introduction of information to achieve a desired outcome beforehand. And secondly, to influence government policies through campaign contributions to legislate on the issue.
Cap and Trade as pushed by Obama would be such an issue. By the way the largest bird swatter manufacturer in North America also happens to be a huge contributor to Obama. And lastly he will do the best to influence the mainstream media, which being a bunch of whores more interested in supporting their falling balance sheets than reporting the facts, is not very difficult, especially when the bird swatter manufacturer also owns one of the largest media conglomerates. Cap & Trade or as I prefer cap & tax is back on the front burner according to Obama’s State of the Union speech. If enacted it would drive the cost of an average home’s electric bill up by about $3.200 per year. I don’t know about you, but I can’t afford that. Cap and Trade is based on bogus science in that it positions man as the primary source of CO2and man at the center of global climatic change. This is pure bull. If humanity turned off every CO2 producing device in the world it would change global temperature by one seven-hundrets of one degree Centigrade. In fact the world’s largest producer of CO2 are termites, not men.
All these issues lead to the very same end, worldwide control of society by a socialist plutocracy. It’s not about the environment; it’s about societal control. It’s not about saving the planet it’s about a dictatorship of the elites. The fact that scientists have succumbed to greed is not a new issue they are no different than you or I. Let me explain how research grants are obtained. I was very intimate with this process when I lived in New Haven CT where Yale along with scores of other academic institutions is located. A professor hires an assistant secretary whose sole function is to fill out grant applications. When a grant comes in the amount is divided up about 40% for the professor’s salary 20% payroll, i.e. the secretary to fill out more applications, 10% for a graduate student to do the work and 30% for the actual research. The very first issue is to find out exactly what the desired outcome of the research is to be and then to formulate and tailor the outcome and plan all work toward those ends. If you think that research is an actual effort to find or develop new technology, you had better think again.
So let’s see who some of the players are. The WWF (World Wildlife Federation) is one of the major pushers of false science and is the author of many inventive papers relating to global warming and other fiction. Polar Bears come to mind. With a present stable population of about 20,000 which is not in decline, the WWF claims that there is a concern about a possible decline in the future due to their imagined global warming theory. If the population of Polar bears were to grow any more, then demonstrably they would kill off all the arctic seals. Green-peace is another group of inventive players. Andy Rowell is an anti-smoking and food safety campaigner who has co-authored some totally bogus, non-peer reviewed, information for both of the forenamed organizations relating to Himalayan glacier meltdowns and Amazon deforestation. Andy’s report was based on falsification of information that he claims came from Nature magazine, the article in question was not about global warming but about the effects of logging. I have done research for years and I never use published articles as sources, only original documentation that has been verified by more then one resource.
In reviewing WWF and Greenpeace produced an IPCC distributed report Canadian annalists located 20 similarities in reports indicating that the authors simply copied from each other. This is in fact journalistic or scientific laziness, copying from others is much easier than doing actual research.
The sad fact is that the mainstream media, just as they did with ACORN, refuses to cover the IPCC scandals, is afraid of the WWF and Greenpeace and has very few journalists sufficiently educated in the sciences to bring corroborated scientific facts to be reported to the public. Considering the over two trillion dollar cost of Cap and Trade and the enormous loss of employment, along with the horrendous cost to the public that is a real shame.
A. H. Krieg’s books are available from all booksellers, or A2Zpublications.com
kriega@frii.com
In life as well as science a certain amount of “reading between the lines” becomes imperative for if we saw every issue by just its face value we should shortly find ourselves in intricacy.
The continuing and ever expanding revelations from the “Green Movement” and the IPCC of the UN and numerous centers of academia seem sufficient to keep all the world entertained. And if that doesn’t suffice R. K Pachauri Chairman of IPCC is always good for a few laughs. I have written and commented on the world climate situation for over four decades, I disagreed with the assertion that we were headed for a new ice age twenty years ago, and since have opposed the greens on global warming, now altered to climate change. These fools are relentless, like a troop of chameleons they adjust their position on a constant and regular basis. What many do not understand is that the entire green movement was co-opted by the socialist movement [the progressives] in the late 60’s. Socialism due to its inherent failure as an economic model converted their efforts to environmentalism in the mid 60’s and they have operated from that position on the scientific front ever since. On the political face they changed their name and beginning during the Wilson administration commenced calling themselves “Progressives” Like Obama, also a progressive, these people are ideologues that refuse to accept the reality of socialisms failure, as is demonstrated in the twenty or so nations that tried it and failed. Sir Winston Churchill said it best; “Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy. Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.” Peloci, Reid and Obama intend to drive this failed system down your throats whether you like it or not. The very fact that academic and political failures like Al Gore and a failed politician Michael Gorbachev are the main drummers on this issue should make us all queasy.
The latest shoe to drop was the realization that the 2007 IPCC report on climate change that was touted as the consensus position of over 2,500 scientists was not peer reviewed, was faulty, contained misinformation, was not properly vetted and contained one Swiss graduate students term paper and a mountain climbing magazine article as proof of global warming. From released E-mail traffic of CRU (Climate Research Unit) at East Anglia University in the UK we have been apprised that researchers have been diddling information and research numbers for over ten years the latest in November 2009. The University is very upset that hackers broke into their computer systems and spilled the proverbial beans on an international scam. The University wants immediate police action taken against the Hackers, seems to us they should be ferreting out the scientist criminals responsible for the worldwide distribution of bogus information that will in the long term cost all of us millions.
This begs the question of how is all this possible? Research scientists all vie for limited grants from government, business and foundations. Much of these funds are provided based on outcome goals. In other words, lets per example take a large corporation that just happens to be a manufacturer of wind turbines, you know bird swatters. Naturally as the manufacturer of such a product in which he will have invested millions is eager to peruse sources that will enhance their ablity to sell these bird swatters. As such he progresses with two policies. Firstly financing global warming/CO2 issues by funding research that supports that position. This is called outcome-based research and it is totally useless. It is not research at all it is the process of trying to support false information through pre-introduction of information to achieve a desired outcome beforehand. And secondly, to influence government policies through campaign contributions to legislate on the issue.
Cap and Trade as pushed by Obama would be such an issue. By the way the largest bird swatter manufacturer in North America also happens to be a huge contributor to Obama. And lastly he will do the best to influence the mainstream media, which being a bunch of whores more interested in supporting their falling balance sheets than reporting the facts, is not very difficult, especially when the bird swatter manufacturer also owns one of the largest media conglomerates. Cap & Trade or as I prefer cap & tax is back on the front burner according to Obama’s State of the Union speech. If enacted it would drive the cost of an average home’s electric bill up by about $3.200 per year. I don’t know about you, but I can’t afford that. Cap and Trade is based on bogus science in that it positions man as the primary source of CO2and man at the center of global climatic change. This is pure bull. If humanity turned off every CO2 producing device in the world it would change global temperature by one seven-hundrets of one degree Centigrade. In fact the world’s largest producer of CO2 are termites, not men.
All these issues lead to the very same end, worldwide control of society by a socialist plutocracy. It’s not about the environment; it’s about societal control. It’s not about saving the planet it’s about a dictatorship of the elites. The fact that scientists have succumbed to greed is not a new issue they are no different than you or I. Let me explain how research grants are obtained. I was very intimate with this process when I lived in New Haven CT where Yale along with scores of other academic institutions is located. A professor hires an assistant secretary whose sole function is to fill out grant applications. When a grant comes in the amount is divided up about 40% for the professor’s salary 20% payroll, i.e. the secretary to fill out more applications, 10% for a graduate student to do the work and 30% for the actual research. The very first issue is to find out exactly what the desired outcome of the research is to be and then to formulate and tailor the outcome and plan all work toward those ends. If you think that research is an actual effort to find or develop new technology, you had better think again.
So let’s see who some of the players are. The WWF (World Wildlife Federation) is one of the major pushers of false science and is the author of many inventive papers relating to global warming and other fiction. Polar Bears come to mind. With a present stable population of about 20,000 which is not in decline, the WWF claims that there is a concern about a possible decline in the future due to their imagined global warming theory. If the population of Polar bears were to grow any more, then demonstrably they would kill off all the arctic seals. Green-peace is another group of inventive players. Andy Rowell is an anti-smoking and food safety campaigner who has co-authored some totally bogus, non-peer reviewed, information for both of the forenamed organizations relating to Himalayan glacier meltdowns and Amazon deforestation. Andy’s report was based on falsification of information that he claims came from Nature magazine, the article in question was not about global warming but about the effects of logging. I have done research for years and I never use published articles as sources, only original documentation that has been verified by more then one resource.
In reviewing WWF and Greenpeace produced an IPCC distributed report Canadian annalists located 20 similarities in reports indicating that the authors simply copied from each other. This is in fact journalistic or scientific laziness, copying from others is much easier than doing actual research.
The sad fact is that the mainstream media, just as they did with ACORN, refuses to cover the IPCC scandals, is afraid of the WWF and Greenpeace and has very few journalists sufficiently educated in the sciences to bring corroborated scientific facts to be reported to the public. Considering the over two trillion dollar cost of Cap and Trade and the enormous loss of employment, along with the horrendous cost to the public that is a real shame.
A. H. Krieg’s books are available from all booksellers, or A2Zpublications.com
posted by Chuck Demastus at 11:57 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home